Norbert Mao Tells Ugandans To Prepare For A Peaceful Power Transition

A varied assembly of political analysts has recently rallied behind Justice and Constitutional Affairs Minister Norbert Mao’s entreaty for President Museveni to ready himself for a serene handover of power. This plea sounds a cautionary note, suggesting that a disorderly change could plunge the nation into the tumultuous days of civil unrest and political upheaval. Opposition figures, religious leaders, and civil society representatives are in agreement that preserving the strides made over the past four decades necessitates a seamless transfer of leadership.

With a 38-year tenure in the presidential office, President Museveni is implored by Minister Mao to contemplate a tranquil transition, underscoring the significance of securing his legacy and the stability of the nation. The minister proposes instigating a national dialogue on the post-Museveni era, a subject previously rebuffed by the President in a 2022 cooperation agreement with the Democratic Party.

Despite State House downplaying the call for debate, various political players express a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism toward Mao’s candid remarks. Opposition leaders such as Erias Lukwago emphasize the imperative need for unity against succession plans that could transform the country into a de facto monarchy.

Patrick Amuriat Oboi, the leader of the main FDC group, perceives a peaceful transition as the most significant gift Museveni can bestow upon the country, pointing out the absence of concrete preparations for a successor. The Alliance for National Transformation party’s Alice Alaso underscores the importance of term and age limits, which were abolished in 2005 and 2017, as safeguards for a smooth transition.

While acknowledging Museveni’s experience, Uganda Peoples Congress Secretary General Fred Ebil calls for a well-thought-out transition. Daudi Kabanda of the Patriotic League of Uganda advises Museveni to ready himself for departure, echoing concerns about a suspected succession plan.

Charity Ahimbisibwe from the Electoral Law and Governance Institute suggests the formation of a constitutional committee for transition, while Joshua Kitakule of the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda calls for a national dialogue encompassing broader issues beyond the transition.

Deputy presidential press secretary Faruk Kirunda deems the discussion on transition somewhat redundant, emphasizing the provisions of the constitution. He assures that if the government loses elections, the winning party will assume control. Mao’s speech underscores the necessity of a peaceful transition, emphasizing its significance over infrastructure development.

In conclusion, the nation grapples with a myriad of perspectives on Museveni’s potential departure and the vital imperative for a peaceful transition to safeguard the future of Uganda, spanning a diverse range of opinions and underscoring the nation’s collective concern.