Hon Odongo Otto Says That Speaker Anita Among And Thomas Tayebwa Would Be Punished In A Normal Country

In an official statement issued on X, Odonga Otto, a former Aruu County MP and a potential presidential candidate for the upcoming 2026 elections, expressed strong disapproval of the current state of affairs in Uganda. His criticism was directed at prominent figures, including Anitah Among, the Speaker of Parliament, and Thomas Tayebwa, the Deputy Speaker. Otto emphatically stated, “In a truly functioning nation, individuals like Anitah Among and Thomas Tayebwa would face removal from their positions, loss of privileges and immunities, asset seizure, and imprisonment.”

Otto underscored the pervasive issue of financial mismanagement within the Ugandan Parliament, accusing officials of utilizing funds under the pretext of “neutralizing opposition.” He directly addressed President Kaguta Museveni, suggesting that the diversion of funds meant for public welfare is being rationalized through claims of countering opposition activities.

With a legislative tenure spanning two decades as an opposition member from 2001 to 2021, Otto’s perspectives hold considerable weight. Despite his ousting in the 2021 general elections, his unwavering commitment to transparency and accountability persists, especially as he contemplates a presidential bid in 2026.

The former MP disclosed troubling details about parliamentary decisions, particularly concerning the approval of a substantial USD 29 million allocated to 33 companies allegedly facing losses in southern Sudan. Otto asserted that only 10 out of the 33 companies actually received payments, raising suspicions about the allocation process. He pointed accusatory fingers at Thomas Tayebwa, alleging his involvement due to prior business interests in Southern Sudan. Otto stated unequivocally, “Thomas Tayebwa, with his steel company in southern Sudan, is well aware of who received payments and for what reasons.”

These revelations expose a broader concern regarding leadership priorities in Uganda. Otto lamented the self-serving nature of certain leaders, declaring, “We have leaders who prioritize themselves over the well-being of Ugandans.” Such allegations further erode public trust in the government, underscoring the pressing need to fortify accountability mechanisms.

Corruption in Uganda is a multifaceted and pervasive issue that has persisted over the years, impacting various sectors of the society, including politics, public services, and business. Several factors contribute to the prevalence of corruption in Uganda, and understanding these dynamics is crucial for addressing and mitigating the problem.

Uganda’s history has been marked by political instability and conflict, which has created an environment conducive to corruption. Instances of political unrest and changes in leadership have at times facilitated corrupt practices, as individuals seek to exploit the uncertainty for personal gain.

Political patronage plays a significant role in fostering corruption. Connections to powerful political figures often determine access to resources and opportunities. This has led to a culture where loyalty to political leaders is rewarded with favors, contracts, and positions, breeding corruption as individuals seek to maintain or enhance their political connections.

Weaknesses in governance structures contribute to corruption. Insufficient transparency in decision-making processes and the lack of effective accountability mechanisms allow corrupt practices to go unchecked. Institutions tasked with oversight may lack the independence or resources needed to investigate and prosecute cases of corruption.

Bribery is a common form of corruption in Uganda, with public officials often soliciting or accepting bribes to provide services or expedite processes. This practice undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in government institutions. Extortion, where individuals are coerced into paying bribes, is also prevalent.

Nepotism and favoritism in public appointments and resource allocation contribute to corruption. When decisions are based on personal relationships rather than merit, it fosters an environment where corruption can flourish, as individuals prioritize personal interests over public welfare.

Mismanagement of public resources, including embezzlement and diversion of funds, is a significant issue. Cases of funds meant for public projects being siphoned off for personal gain contribute to the lack of development and hinder the improvement of public services.

Cultural factors, such as a traditional gift-giving culture, can sometimes blur the lines between acceptable practices and corruption. What may be perceived as a customary gift in one context may be seen as bribery in another, creating challenges in distinguishing between legitimate exchanges and corrupt transactions.

The effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts is heavily dependent on a judiciary that operates independently. In Uganda, challenges related to judicial independence and enforcement of anti-corruption laws persist. Strengthening the judiciary’s autonomy and ensuring that legal measures are consistently enforced are essential aspects of combating corruption.

Encouraging and safeguarding whistleblowers is critical in the fight against corruption. Uganda faces challenges in providing adequate protection for individuals who expose corrupt practices. Implementing robust whistleblower protection mechanisms can serve as a deterrent and enhance the reporting of corruption cases.

Promoting public awareness and education about the detrimental effects of corruption is vital. Initiatives to inform citizens about their rights, the consequences of engaging in corrupt practices, and avenues for reporting corruption contribute to creating an informed and vigilant society that actively participates in combating corruption.

Collaborating with the international community and adhering to international anti-corruption standards can exert pressure on Uganda to address corruption more effectively. International cooperation provides additional resources, expertise, and monitoring mechanisms that can complement domestic efforts in tackling corruption.

A strong commitment from political leaders to eradicate corruption is indispensable. Leaders at all levels must demonstrate a genuine dedication to upholding ethical standards and enforcing anti-corruption measures. Political will plays a crucial role in setting the tone for a corruption-free environment and fostering a culture of integrity.

Addressing corruption in Uganda requires a comprehensive and sustained effort encompassing legal reforms, institutional strengthening, public engagement, and international collaboration. Tackling the issue from multiple angles is essential to create an environment where corruption is not only discouraged but actively prevented and punished.

Addressing corruption in Uganda requires a comprehensive approach that includes strengthening institutions, promoting transparency, and fostering a culture of accountability. International collaboration, civil society engagement, and efforts to empower citizens with knowledge about their rights and responsibilities also play crucial roles in combating corruption and promoting good governance.